Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KarlInOhio
The answer is always "Only with a warrant."

With this ruling, so what?

Don't you think an excuse could be fashioned that some officer (mistakenly) believed that he was acting in accordance with the requirement to get a warrant, even though he hadn't?

14 posted on 12/16/2014 7:58:05 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
Don't you think an excuse could be fashioned that some officer (mistakenly) believed that he was acting in accordance with the requirement to get a warrant, even though he hadn't?
Yes. That's exactly why there are so many IQ<93 cops out there....
92 posted on 12/16/2014 4:27:06 PM PST by Half Vast Conspiracy (I'm done being even remotely civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson