So you are basing your beliefs on the fact you don’t have evidence for your beliefs.
That’s not logical.
“So you are basing your beliefs on the fact you don’t have evidence for your beliefs.
That’s not logical.”
You have it backwards sir. He is asking for proof whereas you simply take it at face value what the government has said is true.
What proof do you have it actually happened? All I have seen so far is a bunch of uniforms in a parking lot and some women and men crying about something no one has even see a little bit of. We do know there were some paid actors on the scene afterwards to illicit an emotional response.
How do YOU know all of those in this so-called incident weren’t paid actors with an agenda? And if so; please provide proof in the way of real pictures. No need to post pics of dead teachers and kids. Just some pics of the shooter dead on the floor or walking in with that rifle will do. If you cannot provide it then how are we to believe it ever actually happened?
Everyone talks like it did but to this day no one has ever produced one single picture to prove it. If you can find one and link to it; I would lean a little farther toward believing it actually happened.
I hope you never sit on a jury with that statement.
I have seen no evidence that there was an ar15 rifle used in this crime. No surveillance photos, no crime scene photos, no shell casings, no bullet fragments, nothing. Now in a world where we could still trust government that might be ok but as soon as Eric Holder was dispatched to this crime scene any element of credibility of this investigation went right out the window.
I have stated that government and the justice dept in particular have been caught red handed, fabricating stories and orchestrating all out illegal activities to further an agenda of gun control. That's called motive.
Now on the other hand you believe a rifle was used even though you have virtually nothing to support that theory other than trust. Now that sounds illogical to me.