“”The AR-15 was specifically engineered for the United States military to meet the needs of changing warfare,” attorney Josh Koskoff said in a release. “
Perhaps he is correct.
So let us conduct an experiment.
We’ll take the AR and fire one bullet into his left leg.
We’ll take a Ruger Ranch Rifle (fires the same cartridges) and send a bullet into his other leg.
We can then assess the damage to determine which gun is “mo bad”.
This is so idiotic as to be breathtaking.
Rifles are used in murder less than half as often as hands and feet.
Rifles of all kinds are used less commonly in murder than either shotguns or handguns.
Yet they sue this manufacturer for producing a rifle that is one of the least commonly used in crime?
Facts and logic do not matter to the left.
It is a bill of rights not “needs”.