Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom

This is George Soros’ (and other financial elites) drug legalization argument, designed to “baffle” “social conservatives” with a “conundrum”.

The elites are morons in this regard; however most sheeple allow themselves to be tricked by the flawed reasoning.

Technically, yes, you could grow your own pot secretly in your house so no one knew, smoke a tiny amount yourself and somehow stop smoking before you started giggling like an idiot - in theory - and just get a little “relaxed”.

That’s all in theory. In practice, any mature adult will admit that they’re actually getting high, instead of trying to play word games, like I didn’t inhale, etc.

Everyone who’s smoked pot knows it’s about getting high. Most will admit that the drug culture from the 60’s was (and is) all about getting high.

Not to mention, the a) slothfulness and b) partying mentalities that tend to take over a person’s life are obviously exhorted against in the Bible consistently throughout.

Yes, there ALWAYS used to be and SHOULD be laws against PUBLIC drunkenness.

If I get drunk in a bar drinking beer, wine, etc., and stumble out into the street and go walkin’ about, yes, I should be arrested for public drunkenness.

We must always keep in mind that the financial elites ARE the world’s drug lords, and they also run the CIA.

This goes back generations; the reader can read up on the Russells (started Skull and Bones and were opium traders), Warren Delano, etc.

This is why the US military is protecting the production of Afghan opium to the tune of 90% of the world’s production; CIA/Skull and Bones/big banks all are run by people who work for the financial elites. The elites have these “minions” in government (like the Bush family, Clintons, CIA heads, etc.) make sure the top-level (billions worth) of drug trade continues as it has for centuries.

Of course, publicly everyone is “against” the drug lords. We just somehow “can’t seem to find them”.


125 posted on 12/16/2014 2:13:03 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: PieterCasparzen
Technically, yes, you could grow your own pot secretly in your house so no one knew,

What does "no one knowing" have to do with anything?

smoke a tiny amount yourself and somehow stop smoking before you started giggling like an idiot - in theory - and just get a little “relaxed”.

Not only is it technically possible, I've done it myself in my younger days.

Everyone who’s smoked pot knows it’s about getting high.

When alcohol was illegal, drinking was about getting drunk.

Not to mention, the a) slothfulness and b) partying mentalities that tend to take over a person’s life

It's been known to happen - but I know of no reliable evidence that it "tends" to happen.

are obviously exhorted against in the Bible consistently throughout.

As are those same sins when lubricated by alcohol use, which certainly has been known to happen.

Yes, there ALWAYS used to be and SHOULD be laws against PUBLIC drunkenness.

Agreed - and ditto for PUBLIC high-ness.

126 posted on 12/16/2014 2:50:38 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson