Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Inyo-Mono

One of mine was born in 1835. He was 49 when my grandfather was born.


16 posted on 12/14/2014 2:55:07 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

I think it was pretty common back in those days when 10 to 12 children per family was the norm. My great-grandfather was around 46 when my grandfather was born in 1879.


17 posted on 12/14/2014 4:01:02 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (Just say NO to Bush in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus; Inyo-Mono

You gentlemen have just noticed that births to parents in their 40s and older are natural! (So are births to parents in their ‘teens.)


18 posted on 12/14/2014 4:48:17 PM PST by Tax-chick (R.I.P., Dad, 11/25/14. Thanks for the lawyers, guns, and money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Verginius Rufus
My great-grandfather who was born in 1835 got married for the first time at 41 and had 9 children by two wives (5 of the children survived to adulthood)--he was in his late 50s when the youngest child was born. The father of that great-grandfather was born in 1780 so he was 55 when the son I am descended from was born.

One of my more distant ancestors had 21 children by three wives--the youngest child was born when he was 73. She was only 5 years old when he died.

20 posted on 12/14/2014 7:25:11 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson