To: josettedupree
If you read a little of the reason, Jerry molested his own adopted son...according to the prosecution, they have much evidence that the prosecutor didn't bring forward due to the possibility of Jerry being prosecution for other things. His own son testified that it was a nightly thing when he was put to bed...but the prosecutions also mentioned much evidence that were not brought forward. They have evidence along with testimony but his son's testimony shocked even the defense lawyers. But this thread is not about
sandusky. I am still waiting for evidence in Cosby case...I will then say he is guility
To: goat granny
I can see why you don’t want to discuss the Sandusky case because it is so similar to the Cosby case. Jerry Sandusky was convicted on many of the charges with only the victim’s testimony as evidence. There was no other evidence presented. Many of the jurors said they convicted Sandusky because of the testimony given by the victims. Like many of Cosby’s victims, these victims didn’t report their abuse to the police,either. Some of these kids’ allegations weren’t made until years after the abuse. One mother did report it at the time and the police conducted an investigation. At its conclusion no charges were brought and they told Sandusky to quit showering with kids.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson