Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10; All

Correct

Plus, the current system favors the political parties.

Senators should be answerable to the local government officials, not the unelected party bosses who control the re-election purse strings.


21 posted on 12/13/2014 12:29:50 PM PST by John Galt's cousin (WTF? We couldn't rescue four men in Benghazi? Is our military IMPOTENT? ( /s ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: John Galt's cousin; All
"Plus, the current system favors the political parties."

Thanks for reminding me. The repeal 17A amendment also needs a provision to prohibit political party support for federal legislative and executive branches. After all, given that one of the very few powers that the feds have that could affect most citizens on an almost daily basis is deciding policy for the US Mail Service (1.8.7), I don’t think that we need political parties fighting for control of that service.

The repeal 17A amendment also needs a provision to restore electoral college. Again, and military issues aside, since the only domestic bills that president should sign or veto should be related to deciding policy for the US Mail Service, citizens don’t really need to concern themselves about who is in the Oval Office.

28 posted on 12/13/2014 1:14:31 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson