Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Too many involved in assessing the scene after the fact don’t consider the fact that folks trained properly in the use of arms don’t necessarily shoot to kill. You want to stop the threat. And we know that doesn’t mean shooting the gun out of their hands. Then again, in the moment, someone may be firing faster than the brain can comprehend there is no longer a threat. Especially with about 20 gallons of adrenelin(sp?) pumping through your blood stream.


11 posted on 12/13/2014 6:25:05 AM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: rktman

“...folks trained properly in the use of arms don’t necessarily shoot to kill.”

That is what you tell the judge. In a gunfight you must intend to kill, because bullets are no guarantee of disabling injury. And if they are armed, you likely lose fast, even if they lose slow. This is one reason why I always carry a knife as a complement to a gun.


13 posted on 12/13/2014 6:49:37 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson