Well done and coherent. Would have been improved by not using Arnold. His story ends up overshadowing the main point, that Boehner has not acted in the interests of the majority of his constituents.
Whether that is distressing to a majority of Republican House members is a very different and important matter. House members work with Boehner all the time and will tend to look at the totality of his actions and his actions as they help or hurt the individual member in question.
There will be some new members very soon, and things will hopefully get more interesting then. It won’t take too long to find out what if any effect the new members are likely to have.
It’s the preacher in me who has been taught inductive preaching....begin with a story and use stories/events to have points realized rather than making points and then using examples to illustrate them.
Do you think writing is better served by points and then illustration?