1.) He has the identical MO each time, ensnaring naïve protégées to his hotel with promises of work.
2.) The protégées all tell the same story.
3.) They even look alike, a sign of his taste in victims.
4.) Etc., etc.
1) & 2) say the same thing, only what stays the same is the slanderous story, in order to reinforce the power of the story for character assassination purposes. Because that's all this is - it will never be heard in court because of no evidence.
3) He is not contesting meeting with them, so why should he not show a preference in women who are asking him if they could come up and spend private time with him?
4) There's no etc., let alone two of them.