Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
I think it stretches terminology to call the Nazis "socialist" without a great deal of explanation of terms.

Well, they were the National Socialist Workers Party.

They certainly were into "social engineering" weren't they?

16 posted on 12/09/2014 1:21:54 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

Lots of commie countries called themselves Democratic Republics though they were neither.

Socialism, to my mind, is simply “all men are created equal” carried one step too far, to include economic equality as well as social and political equality.

“Socialists” have always varied enormously about how they think that goal should be achieved, and what methods they are willing to use to get there. A lot of Americans equate Marxism and Socialism, but of course Marxism is only one of the many variants, albeit the most famous and influential.

If you accept this definition of “socialism,” then Nazism doesn’t qualify. Its goal was to create a permanent hereditary aristocracy of the German people dominating the rest of the world. And of course it’s Fuehrer Principle pretty much put paid to the idea of any real equality within the German people themselves, though it was not supposed to be hereditary.

The Nazis are very difficult to fit into any of the traditional political categories. Italians Fascists, OTOH, are more clearly a variant of socialism.


19 posted on 12/09/2014 1:42:53 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson