Posted on 12/08/2014 1:32:14 PM PST by servo1969
On Sunday, Al Sharpton appeared on NBCs Meet The Press to fulfill his weekend race-baiting quota, discussing the grand jury results in the cases of Michael Brown and Eric Garner. After Chuck Todd asked Sharpton about addressing the problem of economic hopelessness in the black community Garner was arrested for selling loosies, cigarettes outside the pack, illegally Sharpton explained that he supported a jobs bill infrastructure development.
Then he continued by explaining that if Congress didnt pass such bills, black men could not be held responsible for taking care of their children:
You can't kill a jobs bill and infrastructure and then tell men to take care of their families. You can't have it both ways.
Actually, you can. It turns out that taking care of your family is a basic facet of being a decent human being.
*********
When I asked (Darlena) Cunha why we couldnt encourage people to simply not have children before marriage, graduate high school, and get a job, she answered:
I dont think you can encourage people not to have children before they get married and to get a job and to graduate high school when theyre dealing with issues that we dont have to deal with .We need to help them have personal responsibility. They cant do it when theyre busy trying to eat.
In other words, give people money, or they will abandon their children, drop out of school, and refuse to get a job even, as Cunha defends, burn down the property of their fellow citizens and attack police officers.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
That’s a protection racket approach, pay us to not burn down your city.
It is always about money (without accountability); anyone with any expectations of blacks is racist and doesn’t understand what they’ve been through /s.
The reason the TEA Party was depicted as racist is that any threat to the growing socialism is viewed as an attack by a large segment of our population that refuses to work for a living (in which blacks are heavily over-represented). They couldn’t be bothered to even get an education when it is offered for free; just pass the cash...
“Thats a protection racket approach, pay us to not burn down your city.”
That stopped working when it became THEIR city; when whites fled decades ago, that bargaining chip was off the table. If blacks want to destroy the businesses of new “replacement Americans” that have been set up to gather our tax dollars back from the ghetto folk, then let them have at it.
“He said, 11 kids man, Ive got 11 kids. Do the math folks, we are supporting this irresponsible rutting, and they still demand more!”
The children aren’t conceived accidentally; each one provides more $$$ (regardless of the 1996 welfare reform). For too long liberals assumed these welfare bastards were bred out of biological ignorance; in fact, it has ALWAYS been about the money.
" Government Better Rebuild Businesses Destroyed By Riots.. Or There Will Be Hell To Pay!"
one protester, identified as Gunny, said, To be honest, if they dont come and restore these neighborhoods for these people, like when you gotta go travel miles to Walmart to get gas and stuff like that, it should be right here. If they dont restore this community for people who stay here its gonna be hell to pay.
The Small Business Administration said it has received 20 applications for low-interest disaster loans since September,...... but only one business was able to qualify for $4,500 in funding.
How about this guy and his parents pay for rebuilding the business he set fire to....guy in camo jacket was caught on video setting this store on fire and using lighter fluid to inflame it further
http://www.ksdk.com/news/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.