You are lying, both about Cosby's politics, and his victims offering themselves to him.
You then put the icing on your post by saying that Cosby didn't need to rape, as though rape is a valid act for when a normal man is having trouble finding willing girls.
Nope. you are lying, and bald-faced at that. Cosby is RENOWNED for his get-off-ther-plantation politics, far and above any other famous black person on this subject.
In addition, while rape is generally agreed to be an act of violence and not that of sexual conquest, these allegations against Cosby are made within a heavy air of sexual promiscuousness - i.e. the Playboy mansion and its parties and social milieu. Therefore to get a really goos look at the extremity of these charges, one must consciously subtract any and all need for sexual conquests of any kind whatsoever, because he was fully immersed in alll of those types of successes. What is left, according to these allegations, is a specific kind rape perversion requiring drugging - that's it. Supposedly, Cosby wanted that specific thing and nothing else, even though he was making all possible alternative, legal, effortless sexual conquests becaue of his fame and wealth.
That changes things - a lot. That's actually a charge of insanity - and it is made with zero evidence and decades in the past, against a man who has pursued a career based on healing the race divide, acclimizing white people to the normalcy of black people, refusing to use even mild swear words in a business that has become based on the filthiest of talk, and supporting specifically family-oriented values - for a half-century.
But now, because some women are now slandering him, we're supposed to throw out his entire life and accuse him of absolute vileness, deny the massive political realities he lives and represents, destroy his character utterly, literally from the highest to the lowest.
What someone chooses to "believe" in this situation, as it stands, lacking any evidence let alone proof, says FAR more about them than Cosby.