Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hopespringseternal

And yet, LBJ had already thrown his own Great Society programs to the dogs to pay for Vietnam according to the press back at that time. Reusability was the ONLY priority for building the Shuttle; the argument in favor was exactly the one you’re making now; the Shuttle remains the only reusable system that has ever made it to operational status; discounting the ONLY one as “one data point” is absurd; and of course, blaming the Air Force and Nixon for the Shuttle’s problems — problems which are directly attributable to the singleminded pursuit of reusability — is something a Demwit would do.


64 posted on 12/09/2014 12:07:35 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Have you ever read the history of shuttle development? Nasa got little of what they asked for and ultimately built the vehicle the air force wanted.

In no other area of transportation are expendable vehicles considered viable. They were only used for launchers because it was easier to use the ammunition that was available than developing a new system from scratch.

From the beginning, von Braun and others envisioned reusable vehicles and planned to develop them at the first opportunity.


65 posted on 12/09/2014 4:22:35 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson