Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

‘As many people know Elon recently said that: “If we do an ocean landing (for testing purposes), the performance hit is actually quite small, maybe in the order of 15 percent. If we do a return to launch site landing, it’s probably double that, it’s more like a 30 percent hit (i.e., 30 percent of payload lost).”’


4 posted on 12/07/2014 10:03:57 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Hydrazine

$10,000 per pound to go to orbit. 15% to 30% of that payload revenue is lost so you can land on an ocean platform or land. Few, if any, companies can afford that magnitude hit to the profit margin.

I can’t see where that could possibly make economic sense. Wings or parachutes would seem to continue to make the most sense.

Once the “gee-whiz” factor wears off, you’re stuck paying that premium forever.


34 posted on 12/07/2014 11:44:19 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson