Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

You can take the fuel hit; just think of it as structure weight.

The real question is, for commercial missions, who wants to put their $150 million satellite on a used rocket?

Musk can talk himself blue in the face about how reliable it is but business plans and insurers will make the decisions.

Eventually they may get used to it...SpaceX will have the burden of proof on them to show the reliability.


10 posted on 12/07/2014 10:12:01 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Regulator

I just don’t see the point when the shuttle showed for years that a glide is a pretty reliable return strategy.


11 posted on 12/07/2014 10:14:31 AM PST by cripplecreek (You can't half ass conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

“The real question is, for commercial missions, who wants to put their $150 million satellite on a used rocket?”

And what insurance company will insure the payload in case of its loss?

This is a new path that Elon is trailblazing we will see just how economical it will be to have it land, be refurbed, and launched again.


12 posted on 12/07/2014 10:14:32 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Regulator

Who wants to fly on a rocket that has never flown before? Even the car you buy new has been started. They will also get used to paying for the launch and not the whole vehicle pretty quick.


48 posted on 12/07/2014 1:50:30 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson