Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ObamahatesPACoal
King, Sessions and Vitter were the only ones from the start totally opposed to Boehner and Rubio.

What is your assessment of Cruz on immigration?

More specifically, could you accept the Senate bill, but with no path to citizenship?

134 posted on 12/07/2014 1:10:26 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Kennard

I support none of it.

The illegals will sue for more and more freebies.

There might be able to sue outright for a green card.

Also half these pricks in the House GOP support a pathway to citizenship.

Pete Sessions opposes blanket amnesty which means he only supports amnesty for 90%-99% not 100% of illegals.

Goodlatte and Mulvaney both said they oppose a special path to citizenship. Which means they support some sort of path just not calling it special.

If illegals as they stand now can get 50% of state and federal freebies I dont want to make it so they can get 90% of state and federal freebies.

If illegal aliens are stealing jobs in 50% of occupations I dont want to make it legal for them to steal jobs in 100% of occupations.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294057-sessions-border-security-provisions-in-immigration-bill-weaker-than-proposal-debated-in-2007

“They’ll be able to immediately apply for much better jobs than they currently have,” Sessions warned of illegal immigrants set to join the pathway to citizenship. “Maybe they were working at a restaurant part time. Now they’re going to be truck drivers, heavy-equipment operators competing at the factories and plants and we’ve got an unemployment rate that’s very high.”


137 posted on 12/08/2014 1:04:45 AM PST by ObamahatesPACoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson