Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Doesnt mean they weren’t true.

The Feds have a long history of confiscating private property. It goes back a LONG LONG way. Heck you can go into the Smoky Mountains and see cabins that were forcibly taken from the private owners for no other reason then the Federal Govt wanted it.

The Feds have more lawyers than the average individual. We don’t stand a chance of winning against their onslaught of legal mumbo jumbo.


126 posted on 12/06/2014 1:15:02 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

Okay. That the federal government may have taken land for various purposes in the past doesn’t mean they took Bundy’s land.

My own family was forced to sell land to the federal govrnment because it was too close to the shore of a reservoir in Kansas.


128 posted on 12/06/2014 1:18:36 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
Heck you can go into the Smoky Mountains and see cabins that were forcibly taken from the private owners for no other reason then the Federal Govt wanted it.

As they have the right to do, if they follow due process.

"nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

We can argue about whether a particular taking is legitimately "for public use" or whether the compensation is "just."

But we can't argue that the government never has a constitutional right to take private property.

133 posted on 12/06/2014 1:31:50 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson