Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

Well all I can say is you must be seeing different stories than I saw. because the ones I saw all said how he lost the case and his fees were around $1,000,000 and the Feds wanted his land. They killed many of his cattle; used some for target practice.

They already have his neighbors. All for a solar project his Harry Reids son runs.


117 posted on 12/06/2014 12:32:30 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
I have no doubt you saw such stories. So did I.

That didn't make them true.

FWIW, when I lived in the West 20 years ago the greenies hated the BLM. Called it the Bureau of Livestock and Mining.

Was an article of faith among the greenies that BLM's primary goal was to despoil the environment as much as they possibly could.

I spent a lot of time hiking and camping on BLM land. Always seemed to me that they did a pretty good job given their challenges.

That may have changed since. Don't know.

One time, hiking on public BLM land, I encountered a Bundy type rancher. Insisted it was his land and I had no right to walk across it. Got kind of threatening.

Of course, he did NOT own the land, he merely leased the right to graze cattle on it, and I had every right to be there as long as I didn't molest his cattle.

But in his mind, it was HIS land, just as apparently Bundy thinks hundreds of thousands of acres of public domain adjoining his 160 acre base ranch are HIS land.

Doesn't mean they are legally, morally or constitutionally right in that belief.

124 posted on 12/06/2014 1:09:29 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson