[Exmil_UK]

And what % of the fee does the BLM spend on its private Army?
—
Who the heck needs a BLM in the first place when the State Gov. would be far more efficient and fair at running these matters because of simple physical proximity and historical background knowledge of people and places in the state?
—
Why not stop wasting money, abolish the BLM, and sign over to State control all lands not of military or strategic importance to the Defense of the USA?
—
If it needs an act of congress, then it should be passed by a Republican president and Republican Congress, which is possible in 2016, especially if Sarah Palin runs.
—
And either retrain those BLM apes as border patrol agents or fire them if they are useless types, quite possible under the Obumbler Regime.

[Sherman Logan]

Fine. All that’s needed to implement your policies is a law passed by Congress and signed by the President.

It might even be a good idea.

But it’s just not a constitutional matter. It’s entirely within the discretion of Congress.