Why do you bring up “pre-existing” health conditions? Are NY police now supposed to be imbued with supernatural powers of omniscience regarding every individual’s health history?
It’s the same with the “unarmed” nonsense. That status cannot be ultimately determined until AFTER the fact. All officers have to go on is aggressive, assaultive behavior exhibited by the perp.
I said, "A regular jury should have looked at all the facts here, including Garner's pre-existing health conditions at (meant "and") the officer's actions."
In a regular (not grand jury) trial, his preexisting health conditions would have been relevant to his cause of death (possibly exculpatory to the policeman) not the reasons for his arrest.
This is not complicated, I don't know why you would question it.