[elhombrelibre]

I think that 100 at a time is actually a pretty good ratio. As long as we can find them, we can destroy them. If they mass to attack or to defend, they’ll be killed. Meanwhile, there are forces on the ground grinding them down as well. Life for ISIS is nowhere near as pleasant as it used to be.

[expat2]

Exactly.
"A journey of 1000 miles begins with a single stride". Every loss of 100 jihadists damages their morale badly, too.

[dsc]

“I think that 100 at a time is actually a pretty good ratio.”

It wouldn’t be enough if it were 100 per day—and it isn’t.

It took us less than less than four years to take care of the Germans and the Japanese.

Why is it that even a single mooselimb terrorist draws the breath of life, more than 13 years after the Twin Towers attacks?

The only answer I can think of is that we have been betrayed by the ruling class.