To: Lazamataz
1. That isn't a strawman. If it's such a crime, where was the outrage in August?
2. No, I don't understand.
152 posted on
11/29/2014 2:07:08 PM PST by
arderkrag
(NO ONE IS OUT TO GET YOU.)
To: arderkrag
1. That isn't a strawman. If it's such a crime, where was the outrage in August? Of course it's a strawman. There WAS outrage in August... the few of us who heard about it. The outrage got louder the more people that heard about it.
You are a lame erector of strawmen. The strawman in question is the erroneous presupposition that there was no outrage. There indeed was.
153 posted on
11/29/2014 2:11:33 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
To: arderkrag
Here, I know what you can use, next, to defend the Left and their heinous tactics:
Dude, that was like, two months ago.
157 posted on
11/29/2014 2:17:00 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
To: arderkrag
No no no, how about this one:
158 posted on
11/29/2014 2:18:04 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
To: arderkrag
1. That isn't a strawman. If it's such a crime, where was the outrage in August? We are talking about the Nov. 24th story, whizz kid. The day of the riots.
A quiet wedding for Darren Wilson
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson