[SeekAndFind]

RE: It is also hard to fathom that an 18 year old would stick his head in a police car, assault the officer and try to steal his gun. But don’t take Wilson’s word for it. Brown’s fingerprints were on the gun.

______________________________________

How do you square that with this report from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2851608/Darren-Wilson-s-gun-NOT-tested-Michael-Brown-s-fingerprints-officer-able-wash-blood-hands-Probe-s-errors-exposed-grand-jury-files.html

Darren Wilson’s gun was NOT tested for Michael Brown’s fingerprints, and officer was able to wash blood from his hands: Probe’s serious errors exposed in grand jury files

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

What I read was that the gun was tested. The washing of Wilson’s hands means nothing other than he is entitled to seek treatment for his wounds in a sterile environment. Wilson’s hands would reveal NOTHING about the case.

Brown’s bully ways are recorded on video in the store. There were witnesses to his bullying through the window.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Apparently I was remembering that the gun was tested for DNA and not fingerprints. The evidence adds up to the same.

2 + 2 = 4
1 + 3 = 4