Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus
Al Aqsa needs to be simply razed in a spirit of “bring it on.” The reaction and re-reaction might just settle things for a while.

Why not just vaporize Mecca and the Ka'aba and settle things for good?

5 posted on 11/26/2014 6:19:13 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

That would not end Jihad or even damage it terribly. The hard core to which all other moslems defer, believes that shrines, even the Ka’aba, are idolatrous. The structures of mecca are retained as moneymakers- producers of some of the resources necessary for Jihad. Wahhabi the fundamentalest of the fundamentalists call for its destruction along with tombs and other shrines. The necessity for every moslem to perform haj- pilgrimage to Mecca- doesn’t require structures, only a place. The early house of Mohammed in Mecca has recently been replaced by a hotel for pilgrims. Destruction of mecca by non Moslems would merely provide a rallying cry and loud propaganda for Jihad. Nuking Mecca is not a substantial threat.


6 posted on 11/26/2014 6:52:46 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson