She realized justice was done and that justice will be done in her assault and robbery case, too.
They still don’t get it.
The Grand Jury’s decision wasn’t about her son. It was whether or not the police officer should be indicted on any of five possible interpretations of manslaughter to murder regarding the death of her son.
The real brilliance of the judicial system was it used a Grand Jury which had been selected prior to the event had event occurred. No room for a rigged jury accusation.
Unlike the rules of evidence in a trial, all evidence could be considered by the Grand Jury. They even had the benefit of doubt of having been influenced by hearsay from the liberal media and criminal family. Their decision still was NOT TO INDICT.
The only parties not facing the facts and preponderance of evidence are those who want the police officer indicted and even murdered.
How do they respond? By accusations, theatrics, looting, and claims the system has failed them. I would say send them to Palestine/ISIS and let them live on their own in their version of paradise, but that wouldn’t be fair to the inheritance of Israel.