[Biggirl]

Giant PING List.

[StoneWall Brigade]

Hey

[Biggirl]

HAPPY THANKSGIVING WEEK DITTOHEADS! I will for this week have a special one week thread for BOTH the Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin show Threads since this is going to be a short holiday and there will be best of and no live shows the last two days of this week. THANK-YOU to both the Rush and Mark fans for your support. God Bless.

[skinkinthegrass]

ere!

[Enterprise]

Obama is sneering at the Republicans again, telling them to "pass a bill" regarding immigration. The Democrats are taunting the Republicans and daring them to do something.

Over the weekend there was discussion about the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required). It appears that there doesn't need to be another "bill" passed, as this ACT is supposed to prevent Obama from doing exactly what he is doing.

But I think FReepers may agree with me: So What?

It doesn't matter about the act, or any bills the Republicans may pass. Obama will ignore them.

It doesn't matter if the USSC tells Obama to cease and desist, or even if it holds him in contempt. Obama will ignore it.

It doesn't matter if Congress shuts down the Government or attempts to "defund" what Obama is doing. Obama will ignore Congress and continue with his immigration invasion implementation.

Of course, we know that impeachment won't work because the same Democrats in the Senate who support the invasion are going to be the ones who would have to vote to convict and remove Obama, and that WILL NOT HAPPEN!

What is left?

McConnell and Boehner, and Republicans in general must admit to themselves that they are truly powerless to stop Obama now. They must admit that we have had in essence a coup d'etat, and we have now have the beginnings of a dictatorship. Sooner or later, sooner I hope, they will have to go to the people explain to them the gravity of what has happened. They need to explain that Obama has checkmated the Legislative and Judicial branch, and we no longer have a functioning Democracy.

[ColdOne]

Howdy....was busy Friday..so will tell you today. You do such a wonderful job on this thread each and every week day. What you decide to do...go for it.

[Sensei Ern]

Hey all. My father passed away last night. I don't think I will be here much for a few days.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Who torched the stores? The doctrine of vicarious liability.

The Obama-Holder demagogues, the Sharpton race-grievance industry, and many MSM employees surely can be sued by people harmed by the violence. I am no lawyer as you will soon discern; but..

Traditional principles of vicarious liability include

• aiding and abetting and
• civil conspiracy.

Though associated with criminal law, these theories can be used to attribute fault to persons not directly related to an act that harmed a victim.

It must be proved that the others 'provided substantial assistance or encouragement' to those who did harm the victim.

In the SPLC suit against Tom Metzger and WAR the skinheads were not members of Metzger's WAR. But Metzger's rantings had influence over the mindless skinheads due to his reputation in the white supremacy movement

• the argument for liability becomes strong because
• the one with the influence knows that the actor will probably act on his advice.

Tom Metzger recruited 16-year-old Mazzella and schooled him in the world of racist violence. Mazzella was sent to Portland to join up with and train the East Side White Pride [skinheads]. Members of that group later brutally murdered an innocent black man.

How is that any different that being "recruited" in college or by progressive ideologues?

The aiding and abetting theory fits because

• it depicts two or more independent actors,
• at least one of whom encouraged the other(s) to act.

Lawyers can invoke the aiding and abetting theory with relative ease. Invoking the aiding and abetting assumes two independent actors.

To prove an aiding and abetting claim

• the defendant must have provided the actor with substantial assistance or encouragement
• expecting that the actor will commit violence;
• the encouragement must have been largely responsible for causing the violent conduct;
• the crime must also have been a foreseeable result of the assistance.

Civil conspiracy was also used and proved against the Metzgers because he had contacted the East Side White Pride skinheads and after the murder and their arrest one skinhead called Metzger from jail. Here civil conspiracy might be proved by any contacts between the criminals and Sharpton, Holder, Obama, et al.

Obviously I am not a lawyer and this is a kind of an outline of information available on the Internet. Why can't it be used against the "progressives" and racists of all colors?