Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper
He has to have an EO to put any amnesty into effect. No EO, no unlawful amnesty. So no, you are incorrect.

Let me rephrase then - the GOP and SCOTUS has (and will) DO NOTHING when the Emperor tells his Alphabets not to enforce existing law by his decree - which as we have already seen, does not even have to be written for the Alphabets to enact. Case-in-point: DOMA.

Same thing here with "prosecutorial discretion". We have "law" by decree, and laws that are now arbitrary based on personal assent, meaning his wishes can be verbal and the drones in the Oligarchy carry out His Heinous' wishes.

Look, we suffered a velvet coup. There is no stopping this tyranny via civil means. The rule of law is dead.

125 posted on 11/23/2014 11:31:49 AM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: INVAR
No.

The States will use anything he puts out to order an unlawful act to take him directly to the Supreme court.

They are doing that now with the mandated State exchanges in Obamacare. It may bring down Obamacare.

The rule of law has not run out, regardless of how impatient you are.

No-one in the government is going to risk their pension by following a verbal order. It will be written if it happens.

Obama is no closer to amnesty today than he was a month ago.

/johnny

127 posted on 11/23/2014 11:35:10 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson