Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'We Will Not Engage': Michele Bachmann Reveals GOP Plans to Ignore Executive Amnesty
breitbart.com/Big-Government ^ | 11-23-2014 | Robert Wilde

Posted on 11/23/2014 6:23:38 AM PST by servo1969

Breitbart News Executive Chairman Steven K. Bannon asked the congresswoman, who was a guest on Breitbart News Saturday Sirius XM Patriot channel 125, “Has there been any firm commitment from the leadership of the Republican party saying that this amnesty is not going to happen?” Bachmann replied with a question, “Do you want the truth? Okay, I’ll tell all of Breitbart listeners what happened this week. I was floored!”

In the weekly meeting called “Republican Conference” in the House of Representatives, “we all knew that the big issue for the week was going to be the president announcing his amnesty,” she explained. Bachmann recounted that all of the leadership went to the microphone, including John Boehner.

“They acted as though the amnesty issue wasn’t even an issue. They said that the President is going to do what he’s going to do, and we are not going to get down in the mud with him. We are not going to engage, and what we are going to do is to talk about our positive solutions on jobs, the economy, education, and manufacturing,” Bachmann said.

She added that each congressman who spoke reiterated that not engaging Obama and staying positive was a “brilliant strategy.”

"We will not engage," she reiterated with disgust.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bachmann; boehner; executive; gop; michelebachmann; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last
To: The Cajun
They said that the President is going to do what he’s going to do, and we are not going to get down in the mud with him

Don't want to get that nice white linen soiled now, do we ;?

181 posted on 11/23/2014 1:05:32 PM PST by mikrofon (Rules of Disengagement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

No, I have no more faith in the institutions that have been corrupted.

I will be very surprised if the courts arrest and stop what they thus far have been unwilling to do, same as the legislative branch.

The fruits and statements of our leaders are of surrender, capitulation and ‘get used to it, it is here to stay’ argumentation.


182 posted on 11/23/2014 1:16:39 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Administrative Actions are not necessarily unconstitutional.

In the case of Obamacare the legislation was so poorly crafted Congresses Attorneys basically threw up their hands at the administration’s attempts to fix it.

Quite rightly they decided trying to make the case that while this Act says one thing, it is often self contradictory BTW, the sautes derived from it by the executive branch may or may not fall within the intent of the Act. If they could not decide among themselves where the metaphorical pony was in this pile of s#$t how could they make a case in court?

Quite simply this would be a loser for Congress to pursue.


183 posted on 11/23/2014 1:18:29 PM PST by Ocoeeman (Reformed Rocked Scientist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Quote (And of course Obama would veto any repeal.)

No he would may not have that ability with congressional override of a presidential veto. Any government employee acting on the order would be acting in legal peril.

While the possibility of an override may seem remote in this case it is more probable than impeachment because it would allow the Rats cover.

Quote (Defunding or legal action would be required.)

Defunding or legal action on what? We still don’t know what he has cooked up if anything at that is my point.

We have a bunch of people running around bloviating about something that may or may not even exist.


184 posted on 11/23/2014 1:18:29 PM PST by Ocoeeman (Reformed Rocked Scientist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

No I argue the law.


185 posted on 11/23/2014 1:18:36 PM PST by Ocoeeman (Reformed Rocked Scientist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Ocoeeman
Administrative Actions are not necessarily unconstitutional.

Yes. I made that point earlier in a post.

In the case of Obamacare the legislation was so poorly crafted Congresses Attorneys basically threw up their hands at the administration’s attempts to fix it. Quite rightly they decided trying to make the case that while this Act says one thing, it is often self contradictory BTW, the sautes derived from it by the executive branch may or may not fall within the intent of the Act. If they could not decide among themselves where the metaphorical pony was in this pile of s#$t how could they make a case in court? Quite simply this would be a loser for Congress to pursue.

Congress is taking legal action.

And if you look at the specifics of the 24 changes to the law, I believe you would see plenty of changes that fall outside the intent of that law.

186 posted on 11/23/2014 1:24:47 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Ocoeeman
No I argue the law.

No you are arguing semantics.

Do you really think that the president didn't label his 24 unconstitutional changes to Obamacare as a "memoranda", or a "proclamation"?

187 posted on 11/23/2014 1:28:44 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Ocoeeman
Defunding or legal action on what? We still don’t know what he has cooked up if anything at that is my point. We have a bunch of people running around bloviating about something that may or may not even exist.

Obama said in his speech that he will take unilateral action on amnesty. People SHOULD be concerned and prepared for him to take that action.

188 posted on 11/23/2014 1:32:35 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush

Why is it the only honest news we get is from the UK?

Thanks for the story and link. Self-deportation DOES work!


189 posted on 11/23/2014 3:23:29 PM PST by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“She added that each congressman who spoke reiterated that not engaging Obama and staying positive was a “brilliant strategy.”

Stupid gas. Once it’s in your system, you start thinking stupid is smart and common sense is stupid. It kills.


190 posted on 11/23/2014 3:23:49 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Well, call me a rino, but I don't think there is a RIGHT course. He is goading for a fight, we would be foolish to jump in to one without being sure we would win. With the media and the bully pulpit, we'd immediately be on our heels. We shouldn't take the bait. One man's opinion.
191 posted on 11/23/2014 5:00:54 PM PST by FreedomFighter1013 ("Obama to go full Mussolini after [Nov. 4] elections": Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

192 posted on 11/23/2014 5:03:04 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
How does one ignore an executive order that blatantly ignores the law

Easy Thanksgiving break then Christmas Break Then New Years Break, then Presidents day break......

193 posted on 11/23/2014 6:20:07 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: stanne
But Bachmann is done

You do know that Michele Bachmann chose not to run for the House last election, right? She was punished for demanding that the House defund ObamaCare and Boehner chopped her off at the Knees for her effort.

194 posted on 11/23/2014 6:23:59 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ocoeeman
US citizens who help or hire illegal’s can be prosecuted.

By Whom, pray tell? The States(AZ) were dragged into court to prevent them from doing that, and the AG certainly isn't going to prosecute anyone.

195 posted on 11/23/2014 6:27:58 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
Damn those who allowed the number to get so high.

That number is as phony as Boehner. There are 40 million people employed that were born somewhere other than America. Once they issue a green card to someone they can bring in their family, and their family and their family....

196 posted on 11/23/2014 6:31:54 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

They all chopped off Cruz at the knees for his effort. He’s not quitting. It’s going to take a lot more than cowardice and bachmans brand of capitulation to get it done

Her career is over. People who say they’re conservatives and tgen act wimpy and liberal and beaten are done


197 posted on 11/23/2014 6:55:04 PM PST by stanne (We)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Mitch McC said as much c. October 25, 2014.


198 posted on 11/23/2014 7:25:03 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech

Bachmann was unimpressive in her “debates” with the other failed Republican contenders in 2012. She should have stuck to her guns then when it mattered.


199 posted on 11/23/2014 7:27:31 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Yes. Not managing them. Just shut the border. If they don’t like being “in the shadows,” they can go home.

It’s the illegals we should not be engaging with.


200 posted on 11/23/2014 8:41:36 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson