Because after the dust settles and the Senate votes the POTUS will still be Barak Obama. Now here’s the bad news. The Republicans will have been made to look foolish and ineffective, the now disillusioned democrat base will be energized, and the democrat fund raising will have been phenomenal.
Haven’t you figured it out that Obama wants the GOP to impeach him? Why play his game? Obama is the matador and amnesty is his cape. Now why do you want to play the part of the bull? It never works out for the bull, does it?
DugwayDuke wrote:
<<
Haven’t you figured it out that Obama wants the GOP to impeach him? Why play his game? Obama is the matador and amnesty is his cape. Now why do you want to play the part of the bull? It never works out for the bull, does it?
>>
************************************************************
Here’s a comment I posted in another thread making the case for impeachment:
“Only two U.S. presidents have ever been impeached and, even though neither were removed from office, it still leaves a nasty stain on their legacy. (Don’t believe me? Ask anyone you know what the first thing is that comes to mind when hearing Bill Clinton’s name and they will almost certainly bring up Monica Lewinsky.) I will concede that in Obama’s evil and diabolical world, he would likely view impeachment as a vehicle to martyrdom. Even so, this not an excuse to take this constitutional remedy off the table. Simply allowing the Kenyan Marxist to get away with violating our Constitution’s separation of powers and his flagrant usurpation of Congress should NOT be an option.”
At some point, I believe the GOP simply has to do the right thing, even if it may not always be the most popular or politically expedient route.