Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

I don’t see any criminal penalties available for federal employees violating the act. Without penalties available they will continue to act. One of weaknesses of the Bill of Rights is that there is no penalty backing up all those ‘shall nots.’


13 posted on 11/15/2014 2:00:38 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnBovenmyer
I don’t see any criminal penalties available for federal employees violating the act. Without penalties available they will continue to act.

I think the point was for state LEOs to stop making arrests for violating federal laws.

34 posted on 11/15/2014 3:43:18 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: JohnBovenmyer; All

“I don’t see any criminal penalties available for federal employees violating the act. Without penalties available they will continue to act. One of weaknesses of the Bill of Rights is that there is no penalty backing up all those ‘shall nots.’”

That was done deliberately. It is settled law that the federal government cannot order state officers to enforce federal law.

There have been several court cases saying that state officers cannot arrest federal officers in the performance of their duties.

The Feds just do not have enough officers to enforce laws locally, so without local enforcers, they are rendered mostly harmless.


38 posted on 11/15/2014 4:58:59 PM PST by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson