Replies

Perot voters are arch conservative salt-of-the-Earth patriotic Americans. Perot himself turned out to be a clown but at the time he was making a lot of sense and was reflecting the hostility that conservatives had against GHW Bush (Bush I).

Your gripe should be directed to GHW Bush and his ring of RINOs. They are the ones that threw aside the legacy of Ronald Reagan. Perot voters were Reagan supporters and were quick to see what Bush was aiming to do; New World Order, North American Union, etc.

It is unfortunate that the division gave Clinton the chance to get into the White House without a majority but a 2nd term of Bush would have brought worse; why?

Because it was the Perot movement that helped boost the conservative takeover of Congress in 1994, the first time republicans were able to control the House in more than 40 years. That would never have happened in a GHW Bush 2nd term.

And it was conservatives and Perot voters that voted in GW Bush (Bush II) in 2000 because he was thought to be much more conservative than his father and he had stated that his father had been wrong about many things and had made mistakes. He fooled conservatives but his kind won’t fool them again. For example, Romney is a closet progressive of the worst kind and he didn’t fool Perot voters who refused to vote for him and cost him the election.

Now the national GOP knows that conservatives are wiser, getting smarter and are growing. Fat chance there will be a Jeb Bush, a Romney or any other RINO nominated for 2016.

Conservative republicans need Perot voters who number 6 million plus and to get them they need a conservative nominee like Ted Cruz.

Battles are lost and won but it’s the war that needs winning. Don’t snipe at Perot voters for doing the right thing against the RINO class that has serfdom in mind for the likes of you!