Posted on 11/10/2014 8:21:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind
A union company can fire you as allowed by the contract but you get due process and get to tell your side of the story.
And the job protection is there so people get treated fairly and that the boss isn’t just taking it out on you.
He’s my governor and even though he isn’t perfect, I know many Democrats who voted for him this election cycle. Why? Because they believed he represents ALL of Ohio - not just the Republican party. He does some things like for those who get food stamps - those who live in the poorer counties of Ohio are not required to work 20 hours a week to keep their benefits, while those in richer counties do. He isn’t a one-size fits all governor. We need a president who is president of ALL - not just one party. And, yes, he would probably carry Ohio - and we need this state to win the WH. I think she should have gone for making Ohio a right-to-work state rather than what was proposed - they didn’t do a good job advertising what he was trying to do - like Scott Walker did in WI. He should have taken the path that Rick Snyder in MI did - Besides, anyone will be an improvement over what we now have in the WH and Hillary the Beast Clinton.
Lot of uninformed comments here today but this is the dumbest. If Kasich were to run in 2016 he would have a lock on Ohio. What part of being a successful, effective and popular governor don't you people understand?
That’s correct. But Kasich is more COC-friendly than he lets on.
Here is a list of all the counties - with Kasich winning over 80% of the votes in some counties. It was a blowout! I was shocked - especially in heavily-controlled Democratic counties which went 110% for Obama. Kasich won 47 of the counties with over 70% of the votes.
http://www.politico.com/2014-election/results/map/governor/ohio/#.VGD2vLRH_jV
Mind boggling isn’t it at the misinformation on this forum. Some call every Republican a RINO - I’m convinced they don’t even know what being conservative means. The Democrat Party doesn’t have a lock on the LIVs.
Oh contrare! Like the RAT party - you assume that only our party has all the right ideas. Granted, this administration has all the wrong ideas, but, I’m just saying....those who adopt the stance that only one party has the right policies to govern are just as bad as the leftists.
Absolutely!
The map is nothing short of amazing.
The Dem candidate only carried two small counties downstate, Athens and Monroe.
Athens in the home of Ohio University and a lot of radical left college professors.
As for tiny Monroe County, no clue about that one.
Eh??
Where did I say “party” or “our party”?
There is no party in the USA called “Left”.
As for Republicans and Democrats, until they prove otherwise, they are the Uniparty.
Reread what you wrote - you mentioned the left - so I was addressing that issue. Everyone knows which party is Left, so don’t try to squirm out of this one.
John, ESAD!!!
That’s partisan nonsense.
There’s one major party that’s obviously left, but the other supposedly “opposition” party also espouses left wing positions in deed although not always in word.
I just hope he doesn’t run. If he won the primaries, that means I’d have to hold my nose and pull the lever yet another time. I’m tired of doing that.
A union company can fire you as allowed by the contract but you get due process and get to tell your side of the story.
And the job protection is there so people get treated fairly and that the boss isn’t just taking it out on you.
As example, in Ohio most police officers support the 2nd Amendment...but Police Chiefs mostly don’t. Police Chiefs are political appointees...selected for those skewed views, and whose actions are often viewed through subjective populist views rather than objective standards like a business might (earnings). I can understand a reluctance in not having an independent avenue of appeal for your career when you have a strong one now.
It isn’t nonsense at all, and I have to agree - the opposition party is rarely in opposition.
That’s because they are not an opposition party.
The way they treated Reagan back in 1976 when he went up against Ford solidified that in my mind. (I owe thanks to Mark Levin for the historic details.)
Oh please. That name belongs in the history books under “Loser”
What I remember John Kasich is that he was tied to that Congressman who was involved with Chandra Levy and possibly to the orgies that were supposed to have been going on in that apartment. I always thought that was the reason that he left Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.