[Viennacon]

But the ones enrolled through the federal exchange are STILL getting subsidies, which is not what the law says.

Obama will never get any alteration to this through congress.
This is a FAR stronger case than the whole tax/penalty powers argument that we lost because of Roberts’ treachery. The big question was would the court hear it. Now they will.

I can tell you, Kagan, Bryer, Ginsberg, and the Wise Latina are going to have a devil of a time writing their dissent because there is just no conceivable way what is written could mean what the IRS is interpreting it as.

[867V309]

I can tell you, Kagan, Bryer, Ginsberg, and the Wise Latina are going to have a devil of a time writing their dissent because there is just no conceivable way what is written could mean what the IRS is interpreting it as.

Especially since the MIT dickweed who authored it is ON VIDEO bragging that states have to establish exchanges or else lose the federal subsidy.

[Bob434]

[[I can tell you, Kagan, Bryer, Ginsberg, and the Wise Latina are going to have a devil of a time writing their dissent because there is just no conceivable way what is written could mean what the IRS is interpreting it as.]]

I disagree that they will have a devil of a time because the left is now blatantly LYING about EVERYTHING and they simply know no shame- I think the leftie justices will have quite an easy time lying about it and will probably sleep just fine at night because they have no real morals to begin with

[Little Ray]

What makes you think they they would have any problem in saying, “there was so much there, of course someone made a mistake, besides, we’re already giving them subsidies, so we can’t stop?”
It isn’t like those four actually believe in law and the Constitution.