Yep.
If you are an owner, you lose.
If you are a developer with connections to the gambit, you “win” (more and more cash) from The Nationalized Real Estate Spigot.
You as a developer, simply have to be rich enough to make sure that your particular enclave where you want peace and quiet, is richly-and-liberally-connected with a certain amount of cash flow back to the bankster-politicos-and-enforcers.
So, there are rich liberal encampments, like ... Malibu, California, and other parts, where the barons ostensibly (in social circles and among the liberal media) are against baron-dom while joking about being *in* baron-dom and sharing their development(s) with the politically-correct who bash “the rich” while enjoying the spoils.
That kind of leads to the question, Why aren’t the rich liberals generating their own electricity for Hollywood ventures? Why isn’t there in the credits for a movie, or TV show, the electrical bill and how much of that juice was generated by Solar? by Pedaling? by Water? by Nuclear? ...
Nope. The whole gambit is that ... IT IS A GAMBIT ... to be followed by the next liberal wordity, some buzzwords echoed across the liberal [aca]media as the next and then the next ... agenda, issue, matter, movement, something ought to be done about it ...
From which, a Gore, a Paulson, a Romney, an Obama, some (yet another liberal from Berkeley or Harvard - all fat with cash and the next Billboard Website Icon to be splashed upon every webpage) ... will take money from the scheme that pays without producing, without personal responsibility, without contribution to liberty, without preserving our freedoms, without defending our Constitution.
But, it sure does destroy the public’s education in the principles of our once-free country, the same as the liberals destroyed Detroit.
A great description.
We need a third party along the lines of the TEA Party.