Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/08/2014 6:31:17 AM PST by rogerantone1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rogerantone1

That is a pay link.


2 posted on 11/08/2014 6:44:00 AM PST by ansel12 (The churlish behavior of Obama over the next two years is going to be spellbinding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rogerantone1

Them evil Koch brothers.


3 posted on 11/08/2014 6:45:39 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rogerantone1

Perfect example of what is wrong with a strong national government and what’s right with states rights.

A state rep can personally canvas their areas and meet their constituents. We should expect nothing less. State candidates are naturally term limited.


4 posted on 11/08/2014 6:57:44 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rogerantone1

I know that Trumka spent millions of union dollars trying the beat Gov. Walker for the 3rd time, and has nothing to show for it.


5 posted on 11/08/2014 7:03:08 AM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rogerantone1
Money isn’t “speech,” - you can flap your gums all you want without spending money - but you cannot get a printer, ink, and paper for free.
And if you do not assume that journalism is objective - if you recognize that journalism has its own interests, distinguishable from the public interest - you will realize that freedom of the press is the freedom to promote your own opinion vigorously, and as expensively as your purse will allow. Money acquired by selling newspapers is no cleaner than money acquired by conducting any other business. There is no bright line between advocacy and journalism. Both have, and deserve, constitutional protection. If anything frank advocacy deserves more respect than self-proclaimed “objectivity” in journalism.

The Federal Election Commission should be abolished by SCOTUS - and it would be, IMHO, is anyone would bring a case to the Court. McConnell v. FEC was wrongly decided, and with the court as currently constituted it would be overturned.

Present law treats journalism as a priestly establishment, and the FEC should be abolished and the FCC severely constrained (its authority to enforce “fairness” eliminated).


11 posted on 11/08/2014 12:23:27 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson