[Alter Kaker]

The author is naive -- there are no problems for creationists. Because no matter how much evidence accumulates, they will still find a way to ignore it. The scientific question was settled more than a century ago.

[Lexinom]

Living pterosaurs in Papua New Guinea, living sauropods in the Arkansas-sized Likuala Swamp region of the Congo, and Noah’s ark resting on Mt Ararat and visible during years of minimal sunspot activity pose grave challenges for the General Theory of Evolution...

[Sparklite]

“There is no problem so big it can’t be run away from.”
-—Charlie Brown

[colorado tanker]

I someone wanted to start a food fight there could hardly be a better way than that headline.

[piytar]

The scientific question was settled more than a century ago.

Um, with all due respect, anyone who believes that any "scientific question" is settled knows squat about how real science works. For example, the question of the nature and details of something as basic as gravity is still not settled.

/sorry, harsh, but that's reality...

[mlo]

"Newly discovered fossil could prove a problem for creationists"

Dumb headline. All of the fossils are problems for creationsists.

[Keli Kilohana]

Evolutionists always finds what they want to find...

[arderkrag]

Indeed. Never argue against a position someone holds due to their emotions. You get nowhere fast.

[bobo1]

After years of observing that life produces life. Trees begat trees, animals, insects humans, the same,etc

I have come to the conclusion that: In the beginning LIFE (GOD).

Never seen life arise out of rocks, soup, or anything else. Guess some scientists need to refute this simple observation.

Other than that, If God is God, I hardly think he needed evolution.

[editor-surveyor]

What evidence?

The more separate species they find, the less evidence there is for the dream of evolution.

This “find” is no exception.

[CodeToad]

Settled? You are obviously not a scientist. Consensus is not science.

[catnipman]

According to Darwin himself, for his theory to be valid, millions of transitional fossils would have to be found GRADUALLY changing from one species to another. Furthermore, there would need to be millions of transitional fossils along each branch of the so-called “tree of life”.

Darwin assumed that the fossil record of his time was so incomplete because not enough people had been looking hard enough. He also said that if the millions of transitional fossils were not found, it would throw serious doubt onto his theory.

In point of fact, the fossil record is remarkably consistent, showing nothing but abrupt changes where new, whole-cloth, advanced species suddenly appear out of nowhere.

A single so-called “missing link” means nothing.

[Theo]

“Settled science.” Like global warming. Gotcha.

[demshateGod]

It works both ways doesn’t it? Paradigm. Your science is socially constructed and situated.

[JeepRubicon]

Jesus said “I am the Truth” not “I am telling you the Truth” thus when people study the creation, they are studying the work of Christ, He is the very Truth. I don’t even read these stupid missing link / christians beware stories, plain silly....

[Just mythoughts]

Babs Strisend, long for bull. The scientific gods have settled nothing. Genesis 1:2 all flesh life was destroyed when the first rebel rebelled. And man was not in a flesh body when the old dragon decided he would be god. And there is nothing new under the sun since. Evolution is a fairy tale/tail from the devil himself. Too bad the majority are gullible and sell their souls to the fake. But hey that was also foretold.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

The scientific question was settled more than a century ago.

What monkey did you supposedly evolve from? Has that been determined yet?

[FBD]

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/flame_lg.jpg

[Brother Cracker]

[ROCKLOBSTER]

The scientific question was settled more than a century ago

The science is settled, it's a scientific consensus dammit.