Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservingFreedom

So, we should abandon the war on drugs and give the cartels license to do as they please in America? Because nobody “forced” anybody to buy their poison? Is that what you’re saying?


45 posted on 11/06/2014 8:10:14 PM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: RC one

Why not simply follow the Constitution and let the states deal with intrastate regulation of drugs?


47 posted on 11/06/2014 10:56:54 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: RC one
RC one: I like the idea of taking this revenue stream away from the cartels but we have to know that they will recover that lost revenue by increasing/improving their heroin/meth/coke trade.

Cartels can force people to buy and use their products?

So, we should abandon the war on drugs and give the cartels license to do as they please in America? Because nobody “forced” anybody to buy their poison? Is that what you’re saying?

No, I'm saying that if pot is legalized the cartels can't "recover that lost revenue by increasing/improving their heroin/meth/coke trade" because they can't force people to buy and use their products.

And legalizing any drug (with non-excessive taxation) will not give the cartels license to do as they please, but will reduce to negligibility their involvement in that market - just as legalizing the drug alcohol reduced to negligibility the bootleggers' involvement in that market.

50 posted on 11/07/2014 12:14:54 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson