Posted on 11/01/2014 6:30:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Most pundits and pollsters expect the Republican Party to do well in Tuesday's midterm elections. The Democratic Party may outperform expectations, however, for these three reasons.
1. Democrats raised and spent a lot of money, and spent it well.
In overall campaign spending, Republicans have done better than Democrats. Democrats, however, have kept the spending race close. Plus, the Republican advantage is mostly in House races, where the outcome is more certain, than in the races that will determine which party controls the Senate. And, Democratic candidates in several tight races have spent their campaign funds more wisely than their Republican challengers.
Republicans do have a sizable advantage in House races. Republican House candidates have outspent Democratic House candidates by about $98 million ($444 million to $346 million), according to OpenSecrets.org. But, since Democrats have little chance of taking control of the House, the Senate races are where most of the action lies.
There are a significant number of tight Senate races that will determine control of the next Senate. In those races, Republican Senate candidates have outspent Democratic Senate candidates by only about $15 million ($263 million to $248 million). Plus, Democrats have a spending advantage with advocacy groups. Liberal advocacy groups have outspent outside conservative advocacy groups by $41 million ($66 million to $25 million) in federal races.
Additionally, spending is only one measure of a successful campaign. How that money is spent is another.
In many of the key Senate races, the Democratic candidate prudently bought much of the available ad time early. This strategy had several advantages: It means they were able to run more ads than their challengers, they bought the ads when it was cheaper, and it drove up the prices for the ads that Republicans eventually bought.
An Oct. 9 Slate article pointed out, for instance, that Democratic candidates and liberal groups aired more TV ads than their opponents in seven of the nine most competitive Senate races.
2. Democrats still have the sophisticated turnout operation that helped Obama win in 2012.
Democrats built a sophisticated voter turnout operation to help President Barack Obama beat Republican candidate Mitt Romney in 2012. That operation involves a mixed use of large amounts of data with new Internet technologies and active volunteers.
Republicans have generally done better in midterm elections because they get most of their support from demographic groups that vote at higher rates in midterms — voters that are older, white and have higher levels of income.
For Democrats to do well, they must get non-whites, the younger and those with lower levels of income to vote at higher rates than they normally do in midterm elections. If they are able to do that, many of the polls that are based upon "likely voters" could be off by several percentage points.
The Democrat's voter turnout operation already appears to be showing some results in Colorado, Georgia, Iowa and North Carolina. As Nate Cohn pointed out for The New York Times, over 20 percent of the early voters so far in those states did not vote in the 2010 midterm elections.
3. The demographic shift that is expected to hurt Republicans in the future may already be here.
The Republican Party has some significant demographic challenges it must overcome to remain competitive at the national level. Since the country's becoming increasingly racially and ethnically diverse, Republicans will need to do a better job at reaching out to non-whites.
Some Republican strategists have argued that the Party does not need to do that yet. In the short term, they argue, they can win elections by mobilizing more white voters. (An Aug. 1 Christian Post analysis pointed out why that strategy would be a disaster.)
It could be, however, (and this dovetails with reason #2) that the demographic shift that Republicans are dreading is already here. They would know this is the case if non-whites turnout in high numbers and prevent the big Republican wave that the pundits and pollsters are expecting on Tuesday. After all, if Republicans cannot win in 2014, when can they?
bingo
The dems are really going after the rural, mostly Indian votes. They are making sure the Indians vote enmass for the dems this time; usually Indians don't vote at all. We have 100,000 Indians in Alaska; I sure hope they all don't vote.
1. Fraud
2. Stupidity
3. Intimidation
The 3 pillars of rat politics.
They’ll continue this BS right up until Tuesday. Then all these articles will be flushed from memory. And they’ll start over talking about how the GOP is going to lose in 2016. How they need to reach out to Democrats. How they need to work with Obama. Etc.
1: Voter fraud on an epic scale
2: RINO war on the Tea Party
3: Alienating blue collar whites with shamnesty
Exactly. Suddenly there are headlines everywhere about nasty Republicans gaining in the polls blah blah even on Drudge (Ernst up by 7 points Aaaaagh the horror!!) - all to panic demoncRATS into getting off their arses to vote. It’s all slickery like media manipulation and head games. Nothing is real anymore. Can’t trust a damn thing going on out there. And if all else fails the ballot stuffing and dead people voting and illegals voting multiple times will seal the deal. And if that fails lawsuits and recounts will jack things up for months. Ain’t much USA left. The lunatics are running the asylum.
I'm worried it will throw a close election in dems favor and I am seeing it first hand, completely legal too. Indians are too stupid to realize they'll screw them too after Begich gets in, GRATES ME TO NO END.
Heard about it on a Hugh Hewitt replay the other night. The DNC has a ground game in your state that they hope will save them.
The E-GOP is so disjointed nationwide, and many like me won't volunteer after all the snubbing and sticking it in our ear, aka Mississippi and all the anti-teaparty shenanigans. And they have no master-plan or central website like this and they are 10 years behind.
And people wonder why we want a new party? The E-GOP has to be torn down to the Foundations and a new house needs to be constructed...
Be close, sure hope the Repubs turn out to vote. There's 100,000 Indians, I bet 30-40 thou vote from dems ground game. Only 547,000 reg voters in Ak, more Repubs than dems, but 35K Indian votes can throw election in dems favor. You'd have thought the Repubs would have done better, must not care about Ak?
Hmmm.
In 2010, we (all 7 of us) never saw a census taker. That was OK with me then, but now I wonder.
This statement is bogus:
In many of the key Senate races, the Democratic candidate prudently bought much of the available ad time early. This strategy had several advantages: It means they were able to run more ads than their challengers, they bought the ads when it was cheaper, and it drove up the prices for the ads that Republicans eventually bought.
Evidently the writer never heard of the “lowest unit rate” requirement spelled out in 47 U.S.C. Sec. 315. The GOP would be entitled to buy the same advertising at the same rate the ‘Rats bought it.
Depends on where you live? Just Google for info.
I know a Democrat. I can get you a ballot. Just tell me which state. You won't even have to mark it; it comes that way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.