Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MIchaelTArchangel
No, I am not falling into a murderous ideology. I have studied Mohammad and have concluded we have two choices: we either kill them or they kill us.

Well, if it ever comes to that, then hopefully it will be under the legal auspices of waging "legitimate" warfare under the banner of a state or states, as opposed to individuals taking murderous initiative on their own.

We have enough of that nonsense already.

Would you react the same way if I said Kill all the Nazis in 1941? After all, they were out to kill everyone who was not a Nazi.

The blanket way in which you made the statement ("Kill all followers of Mohammed") would suggest arbitrary execution of women, for instance (and even children). Women at least, certainly.

After all, they're followers of Mohammed, right?

Such statements are simply too broad. Using reason, compassion, and logic to decline indulging in such indiscriminate killing is exactly what distinguishes "our side" from the unthinking animals who we will someday necessarily be forced to destroy.

And, ironically, many muslims will stand with us to assist in that pogrom.

Because if they are not with us, they are against us.

This may ultimately result in there being as many Mulsims around in the future, as there are Nazis nowadays.

But, just as there are still some Nazis (and their ilk) there will always be religious totalitarians to deal with, because in a Free society, we can't prosecute people for crimes until they actually commit them, or at least until we have evidence of a conspiracy to do so.

Thus, I ultimately have to disagree with the "Kill all followers of Mohammed" sentiment, as I believe this war can be won without our side having to act as starkly and indiscriminately as the evil animals do.

But I certainly understand what you're getting at.

We're all familiar with the phenomenon of a religion being selfishly interpreted by its adherents in order to justify immoral acts. No religion is immune to such abuse.

But Islam is inherently more dangerous than any other modern religion because of the fact that it openly advocates violence and oppression to facilitate its spread. It's right there, printed directly on the pages of its holy book, the Koran.

This, of course, includes the "routine" act or murdering those who refuse to convert to Islam.

While most other religions must be twisted and manipulated in order to endorse such practices, Islam's teachings can be effortlessly used to justify such immoral acts.

Any ideology which includes such an indiscriminate view with respect to killing one's brother is intrinsically more of a threat, because its followers, once they are confirmed in their faith, do not have to do any rationalization of their acts. They can simply read the verses from their holy book and take murderous action, whether it be against "infidels", women, children, or anybody else.

Constant vigilance and prejudicial attitudes are needed to combat inherently destructive ideologies such as Islam, Marxism/Communism/Socialism and their ilk.

39 posted on 11/01/2014 1:01:42 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
And, ironically, many muslims will stand with us to assist in that pogrom.

Yep, they prolly have a big ol' secret club somewhere .. they hang out and support Western civilization with blogs and ululations about the evils of their goathumping brethren.

DO send us a link to that membership roster when you get a chance, k ?

40 posted on 11/01/2014 1:10:11 PM PDT by tomkat ( /.02)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson