This is exactly what happens when you answer questions based on a false narrative.
Republicans constantly step in it by accepting the left’s talking points.
The Bushes wouldn't have any talking points otherwise.
Wow, he:
1. Confuses natural wave/soil erosion with water rising.
2. Claims he hasn’t actually seen it, but assumes it must be true.
Total fool.
Exactly. That said, I don't think that dodging the question would be helpful ultimately, so it's really important that you have a well thought out position to state. Climate change has been one of the left’s biggest issues for a long time now, but still the Republican responses have been fragmented and often not very well thought out.
It's not that difficult to be armed with facts that document you have thought about the issue deeply and that your opinions are based on valid scientific information.