[exDemMom]

I don’t understand this, they say it has to be in droplets but then they say it isn’t spread through the air but from what I read they said it can survive up to 6 days outside the body, that it doesn’t need to be in droplets so isn’t that “airborne”? Well I guess we’ll find out after the election when the ball drops and we get the real number how many are infected, after all as we have seen with Benghazi, Democraps getting elected is more important.

Droplets fall to the ground almost immediately. The only way to get exposed to Ebola from droplets is to be within their trajectory path.

Airborne particles are very tiny, dry out quickly, and can remain in the air for 2 hours. Plus, they can be moved by air currents some distance from their source--you don't need to be in the same room as a sick person to catch an airborne disease, you can catch it from walking by an open window. Ebola viruses are too large to fit into those small particles, and do not survive being dried out.

[Diogenesis]

Again you are mistaken and ignore quite a bit (unclear why).

1. Ebola survives in the cold and certain surfaces.

2. And it survives MONTHS in humans who are allegedly “cured”.

3. And you have ignored the animal reservoirs
which are about to develop and grow.

4. And where is the data showing filoviruses are “larger”
than the droplets. That is nonsense.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Well I read a billion of them can fit into a centimeter drop of blood which sounds pretty damn small to me. Plus these nurses in Dallas who got it, they said only their neck was exposed, so what did this guy Thomas Duncan do, sneeze on their necks and then they rubbed their necks with their hands and put it in their mouths? Maybe, but I tell you that sounds pretty unlikely. Aren’t they completely disinfected from head to toe then they take a shower? This is two nurses who got infected from this guy.