Thanks.
You might recall the program called “Able Danger” Bill Clinton got rid of in 2000 as soon as he found out how it worked.
It worked by looking for “patterns” in open source information and working it down to who was creating the pattern.
With 90% of the preparation in the news, the people controlling the content of the news is on the left and the Clintons in particular.
The “Bush stole the election” nonsense before the 9/11 attack was created by the Clintons.
The spin of the news after the attack was also Hillary’s doing with her holding up a newspaper proclaiming “Bush Knew”.
The Clintons had what they called a “20 year plan”.
Bill Clinton would serve as president 8 years, 4 years for another president, then Hillary would be president for 8 years.
Not only did the Clintons have to make sure Gore didn’t get elected (Bush stole the election) but they had to have a plan to bring down a sitting president (Bush Knew).
When the 2 were put together we had “First Bush stole the election then he allowed 9/11, he’s becoming a dictator”.
After the 2004 election OBL released a statement or tape in which it’s clear the objective of the 9/11 attack was to bring down the president.
If it was the terrorist that had the objective of the 9/11 attack, why would OBL begin planning an attack in 1999 whose objective is to bring down the president when the president he planned on bringing down hasn’t been elected?
He wouldn’t.