Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rummyfan

Yes, the airframe does age.

But the skin and frames and bolts and rivets are inspected, and checked based on actual flight hours. Note that many, many Air Force planes have low flight hours/year compared to the civilian daily use in many flights. (This even with the nuclear alerts under SAC.)

But, the USAF B-52 used at low levels stress the airframe much more than the “gentle” turbulence at a commercial airline’s 35,000 ft. Almost all of those 52’s were retired. (B, C, D, F, G models.) Today’s are H’s.


17 posted on 10/27/2014 7:02:38 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The H models have benefitted from two things:

1) A strengthened airframe, significant modified from the earlier models, for low level penetration.

2) having spent the first half of their lives sitting ground alert, not racking upma whole heck of a lot of airframe fatigue hours.


18 posted on 10/27/2014 7:07:13 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Oh, 3rd thing too: since assuming conventional missions, the Hs operate at much higher altitudes than they were designed for (as you mentioned), further reducing airframe fatigue.


21 posted on 10/27/2014 7:09:48 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson