Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bratch
For those who don't do Facebook:

It is interesting...

The Punditry class is noting voter dissatisfaction with both parties and are predicting the rise of outside parties / runners in the coming years.

So one could ask:

* Is Sarah saying yes, it is ok to vote for candidates that are not affiliated with broken party A or B?
* Is it her giving up hope in certain circumstances in regards to the E-GOP?
*A Women scorned and settling a score for all things E-GOPian, Rovian, Romneyian, Barbourian( - Mississippi ), Peggy Noonian, and K-Streetian that have tried to destroy her and her family for the last 6 years? Kind of like the day Rush asked his callers to call the capital hill switch board and he melted down the lines?

I don't have the answers, perhaps time will tell us as events unfold, perhaps it will also denote, "she's baaacckkkk" when everyone has been saying her stock is on the decline....

105 posted on 10/26/2014 11:10:26 AM PDT by taildragger (Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: taildragger
I don't have the answers, perhaps time will tell us as events unfold, perhaps it will also denote, "she's baaacckkkk" when everyone has been saying her stock is on the decline....

Well, she and Todd both have severe competitive streaks dating back to their childhoods.

Since you're speculating...

Could the ruckus at the recent party be more related to this announced stance taken by SP than was first apparent? I'm thinking there is a correlation somehow between the two events.
106 posted on 10/26/2014 12:13:00 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson