Correct. The salient issue is the ability of pollsters to determine the impact of electoral fraud. It may seem impossible but paying close attention to Democrat tactics should make everything clear.
Fraud is a policy issue for Dems. Their ground game tacticians base their efforts on the extent to which they can commit fraud. There is no attempt to hide or get away with anything. They know they will not be caught because no one is doing the catching. Small potato workers may be held accountable but only if an entire system of deceit comes unraveled.
It would be most helpful if polling organizations maintained a line item for fraud. It would get us closer to the true nature of elections and it would give them a better chance of getting their prognostications correct.
Erick doesn’t even *bring up* vote fraud in the article.
Someone posted a horrifying graphic of the four swing states (PA, FL, OH and KY)’s fraud that gave the election to zero, against most polling.
MS SCOTUS ruled yesterday in Cochran’s favor after he compelled voters to commit fraud by voting in both the R and D primaries.
I can’t even imagine what heinous fraud will be evident in CO: how will the RATS know when to stop counting the fraudulent votes they ‘harvested’ and filled in to avoid Chickenpoop and Udall from winning with 20% margins?