I wouldn’t say I’m a constructivist but your “logic” is socially constructed And motivated.
voting is a civic matter.
Civics is a “practical affair”, not a religious affair. It involves the virtue of Prudence. A discussion would include the ability to gather information and weigh different factors to come to sound decisions. Informed decisions. With a sober mind. Circumspection. Judicious. Are those catholic words? The mainstream pro-life political cause is often disabled by dissenters who reject a “Faith and Reason” approach.
Voting is not a sacrament. Not a religious exercise.
Logic is anti-Constructivism, but it is epistemology
My motivation is stop the Boycott widespread in U.S. religious voters and silence the effort to suppress the religious vote. Kill the “blank voting” movement.
If A < B, the B > A, irrespective of how you wish to spin it. If you want to argue that A = B, then go ahead, but arguing that A being < B does not mean that B > A is idiotic (and illogical).