I never said I wanted the Rat to win. I hate Rats more than I hate RINOS, but that doesn’t mean I have to vote for RINOS.
ok, so I think we established that you want the Rat to lose. That you think it is better if the Rat loses.
But on the one ballot you get ... you are not putting a vote against him. Hmmm.
The ballot is going to be used to determine the winner. And there is no vote against the Rat. I guess .... I don’t see the logic. Seems oxymoronic or something.
A < B, but B not > A. Therefore, A = B.
If you want the Rat to lose, it is imperative to vote against him.
I understand if there is only one possibility because the race is already over ... then it doesn’t matter because the ballot isn’t be used to determine the winner. Needs further study.