To: pieceofthepuzzle; Columbo; MiddleEarth; Shelayne
The implications of reinfection in someone who has circulating antibodies are scary, and suggest that it might be harder than we think to create a viable vaccine. This is an enveloped (membrane coated) virus, as HIV is enveloped, and unless a vaccine is against one of the proteins embedded in the envelope it might not be effective. Making it even more of a problem is that the major viral protein in the envelope is glycosylated (coated with sugar molecules) and this makes it harder to develop antibodies against.
Columbo also wrote:
This could be a dumb question and is off-topic....would eating a zero carb diet help against glycosylated vidii?
I was actually thinking the same a few days ago. There is ample evidence that most cancer cells rely on glycolysis and a VLC diet has been shown to be beneficial in cancer reduction (
Warburg) as far back as 87 years ago. I do not know and think it would be an interesting area of discussion to determine if interrupting glycolysis would impact the rapid replication of a glycosylated virus such as ebola.
There are so many avenues of research with this and I would wonder if being on a Ketogenic diet imparts some degree of protection from infection. I'm not sure how effective a VLC diet would be after infection because of the rapid replication of the Ebola virus.
155 posted on
10/23/2014 6:26:07 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: PA Engineer
I know about the Ketogenic diet and if Ebola gets crazy, I’m all in. Certainly couldn’t hurt.
161 posted on
10/23/2014 6:54:05 PM PDT by
MiddleEarth
(With hope or without hope we'll follow the trail of our enemies. Woe to them, if we prove the faster)
To: PA Engineer; Columbo
Interesting comments. The Warburg effect is also very interesting, and cancer cells do have a very high rate of glycolysis, but this metabolic shift is now thought to occur because of the malignant state of these cells - and is not the cause of malignancy as Warburg originally postulated.
Even with a ketogenic diet you will still have glycosylation, because you can provide sugars via other biochemical pathways. That said, whether or not the rate of glycosylation would be affected is a very interesting question.
Ketogenic diets were touted back in the 1930s for treating urinary tract infections - I guess by lowering urine pH. Ebola uses the host cell ribosomes to make virus proteins, including those that are found in the envelope. I don't know if glycosylation of these proteins is required for replication, or is an adaptation of the virus to avoid immune clearance.
Thanks for the questions, both of you.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson