Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
given current brain scans of long term users and the fact that we know in large enough recreational uses it does in fact cause hallucinations, these doctors have no credibility.

Utterly irrelevant to whether it meets the Schedule I criterion of having "no accepted medical use."

19 posted on 10/23/2014 12:47:43 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

pot has no medical use.


73 posted on 10/24/2014 8:15:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: ConservingFreedom

pot has no medical substantiated medical use. Even the vaunted mythical use of the charlette’s web (awww a children book reference) strain is nothing more than a unabashed ploy. (it is legally available in pill form from the pharmacy right now via a dr prescription)


75 posted on 10/24/2014 8:22:24 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson