To: longtermmemmory
given current brain scans of long term users and the fact that we know in large enough recreational uses it does in fact cause hallucinations, these doctors have no credibility.Utterly irrelevant to whether it meets the Schedule I criterion of having "no accepted medical use."
19 posted on
10/23/2014 12:47:43 PM PDT by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: ConservingFreedom
73 posted on
10/24/2014 8:15:17 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: ConservingFreedom
pot has no medical substantiated medical use. Even the vaunted mythical use of the charlette’s web (awww a children book reference) strain is nothing more than a unabashed ploy. (it is legally available in pill form from the pharmacy right now via a dr prescription)
75 posted on
10/24/2014 8:22:24 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson